The IWC’s Reputation Problem: Loud, Divisive, and Profiting Off Chaos

Is 2025 Wrestling Fandom About Being Loud or Being Real?

---

The Internet Wrestling Community (IWC) is a mess. It’s a chaotic mix of passionate fans, self-proclaimed insiders, and clout-chasers who thrive on drama and division.

In 2025, the IWC’s reputation is at an all-time low, dragged down by too many accounts—especially those with massive followings—who spread ill will, push unverified rumors, and stoke tribalism with little accountability. These voices often prioritise being first over being factual, then turn around and ask for subscriptions to their “exclusive” news, which is often just recycled speculation you could figure out yourself.

This isn’t just a wrestling problem—it’s a snapshot of 2025 society, where loudness trumps truth, and engagement is king.

But amidst the noise, there are accounts that stand out.

They challenge my wrestling perspective, entertain, and stay true to the spirit of fandom without manipulating narratives to cozy up to promotions like WWE or AEW.

Below, I spotlight seven such accounts. These are voices worth hearing in a crowded, often toxic IWC.

The IWC’s Problem: Too Many Voices, Too Little Accountability

The IWC is a double-edged sword. It’s a space where fans can debate storylines, share memes, and celebrate wrestling’s magic. But it’s also a cesspool of toxicity, where large accounts with thousands of followers wield influence without responsibility. They’ll post inflammatory takes, like bashing a wrestler’s performance or spreading unverified “scoops” about backstage drama, only to delete the evidence when called out.

No accountability, no apologies—just onto the next viral post.

Many of these accounts monetize their platforms, asking fans to pay for newsletters or promising “insider” knowledge.

But often, you’re just paying for their bias—repackaged rumors or takes skewed to favor specific promotions. This mirrors broader 2025 trends: social media algorithms on platforms like X reward engagement over accuracy, so divisive posts rise while nuanced analysis gets buried.

The IWC’s footprint is shrinking, with active X users making up less than 10% of wrestling viewers, yet their influence shapes perceptions disproportionately. The result? A fractured fandom where tribalism—WWE vs. AEW—overshadows the art of wrestling.

A Reflection of 2025 Society

The IWC’s woes reflect how we consume information in 2025. Speed beats substance. Being first to tweet about a match result or rumored signing earns clout, even if it’s wrong.

X amplifies this, rewarding hot takes with reposts and likes. This isn’t unique to wrestling—look at politics or entertainment, where viral misinformation often outpaces corrections.

In the IWC, accounts rush to post spoilers or dunk on wrestlers before the show ends, prioritizing clicks over truth.

This dynamic breeds manipulation. Some accounts align with promotions (either softly or outright blatantly), pushing narratives to gain favor or access. Others play both sides, stirring up WWE vs. AEW wars to keep fans engaged (and subscribed).

It’s not about wrestling—it’s about their brand.

Fans, craving community or validation, fund these voices, only to get echo chambers or recycled gossip. The real story? You can often deduce it yourself by watching the shows and thinking critically.

Shining a Light on Authentic Voices

Despite the IWC’s flaws, some accounts cut through the noise. They challenge, entertain, and stay independent, avoiding the trap of manipulating narratives for clout or promotion favoritism. Here’s why I follow these seven accounts in 2025, and you should to:

@DonTonyD: A veteran podcaster and commentator, Don Tony delivers blunt, passionately researched, takes on wrestling’s highs and lows—both historically and present day. His content mixes humour with detailed analysis of storylines and booking. He’s known for calling out IWC nonsense and staying independent, not shilling for WWE or AEW.

His reputation is solid among fans who value authenticity with equal candor, proving he’s not afraid to challenge all promotions.

@JDfromNY206: JD is a polarizing figure, known for his “Off The Script” podcast and fiery, unfiltered takes. He covers WWE and AEW with a brutal honesty, often diving into booking flaws or backstage rumours.

While some fans call him abrasive—others defend him, noting he bases opinions on reported facts and show analysis.

Despite being blocked, his reputation as an independent voice holds up for those who appreciate raw passion over polished narratives.

@minnieportable: Minnie is a refreshing voice, blending fandom with sharp commentary. She avoids toxic tribalism, offering balanced takes that don’t pander to promotions. Her reputation is niche but positive, I appreciate her authenticity and lack of clout-chasing. She’s a hidden gem in the IWC.

@Marie_Shadows: Marie stands out for her deep dives into psychology and storytelling. She’s respected for her thoughtful, promotion-neutral takes, avoiding the rumor mill or tribalism. She elevates discourse, not drama, making her a go-to for fans seeking substance over sensationalism.

@WrestlingSoup: A rowdy, irreverent staple of the IWC who deliver unfiltered takes with humor, covering WWE, AEW, and indie wrestling. If you enjoy raw, unpolished commentary that doesn’t bow to promotions check them out. They’re not for everyone—but their independence is undeniable.

@solomonster: Jason Solomon, aka The Solomonster, is respected for his balanced, well-researched commentary and he’s the Commissioner for HoG Wrestling.

@iamjondraper: Jon’s love for wrestling history and storytelling makes his takes stand out. He’s not chasing the latest controversy—he’s here to celebrate what makes wrestling great. His movie knowledge is A1 too.

These accounts aren’t perfect, and they don’t always align with my views, but they’re proof you can be influential in the IWC without being manipulative.

They entertain, provoke thought, and keep it real, which is more than I can say for the “scoop” accounts begging for your $5 a month.

Can the IWC Change?

The IWC’s reputation won’t improve overnight.

As long as social media prioritises engagement over truth, the loudest, most divisive voices will dominate.

But fans have power. By amplifying accounts that prioritize authenticity over clout, we can shift the culture. Stop subscribing to “insiders” who peddle recycled rumors. Unfollow accounts that thrive on tearing wrestlers down or stoking tribalism. Support voices that challenge you to think, laugh, and love wrestling for what it is—an art form.

In 2025, the choice is ours: keep rewarding the loud and wrong, or elevate the thoughtful and true. I’m betting on the latter. Who’s with me?

Want to join the conversation? Share your favourite IWC accounts on X and let’s talk wrestling—without the noise.